← Blog
Blog Dec 21, 2017 · Aziz Boxwala · 2 min read

CDS Forecast (Part 2): Cloudy With a Chance of FHIR

When is cloud-based clinical decision support the right call? A practical guide to prioritizing which clinical requirements to offload first.

In part 1 of this post, we discussed the pros and cons of cloud-based services for clinical decision support (CDS), and how CDS Hooks is wiping those cons away. In this post, we’ll explore when to use cloud-based CDS services, and how to prioritize which clinical requirements to address with these services first.

When Cloud-Based CDS Is the Right Call

The big advantage of cloud-based CDS services is that you move the burden of creating and maintaining the CDS knowledge bases (rules, value sets, etc.) to your service provider. The list below suggests when going with cloud-based CDS makes sense:

Rich User Interactions in the EHR Workflow

Another category where cloud-based CDS services are useful is when there is a need for rich user interactions to be integrated into the EHR workflow — that is, when the EHR’s own user interface isn’t good enough for a particular scenario. SMART-on-FHIR apps can be used to create custom user interfaces for complex interactions. These apps often plug into CDS to yield the best results. Why go through the pain of integrating small SMART-on-FHIR apps with an on-prem CDS vendor that won’t prioritize the integration? In this scenario, a cloud-based CDS with simple interfaces — preferably CDS Hooks — is the way to go.

Thinking about moving some of your CDS to the cloud? We can help you pick the right scenarios and the right integration approach.

Contact us